Symbolic Interactionism has a scholarly website and encyclopedias tell one what it is. I am studying research, and I have just encountered it.
Research is about asking the right question, so quantitative research data may be compromised if the numbers relate to a failure in Symbolic Interactionism e.g. the respondent to a questionnaire misinterpreted or misunderstood the question and said 4 in a range of 1 to 4, meaning good, when the question set 4 meaning bad. Isn’t that just poor communication or poor testing prior to release of a research tool?
I find it hard to see the fuss though. Surely it has been long known that children understand questions differently to adults. Ask a child what a long period of time in their future might be and they may reply with a figure in days, whereas an adult thinks in periods of years. Hence a child may answer the question of how old they are with "6 and three quarters" whereas an adult might answer 21, though nearly 29Symbolic Interactionist joke
A man was cruising in his car when he realised he was lost. He stopped and asked a passer-by for guidance. Being a Symbolic Interactionist, she replied "I wouldn’t start from here, if I was going there."
No comments:
Post a Comment